Re: Linking to XLX reflectors
Steven Blackford
There’s been an issue w/ use the XRF protocol w/ XLX reflectors known for a while. That’s why we recommend people use the DPLUS or DCS protocol on our XLX reflectors. I know for some, that can be an issue, but it solved all the problems we had w/ our users. 73 de K4SQI!
Steve, K4SQi
From: Dick Herrick via Groups.Io
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2018 3:17 PM To: ambe@nw-digital-radio.groups.io Cc: Circuit Riders Subject: Re: [ambe] Linking to XLX reflectors
I suspect it’s an interim solution. Friends using Windows machines can access 2-way audio by calling up the XLX reflectors. What you have here is a work-around which is fine. However, I would not have known the association between the DCS and XLX nomenclature. How did you figure that one out?
I was able to open the plist data in 1.2.3 to compare the “strings” in XLX and DCS plists. Sure enough they point to the same … what appears to be … numeric DNS locations. For your DCS600XLX600 example they both point to 13.16.14.204. So is one a proxy for the other?
Thanks for writing back.
Dick Herrick, BEE, PE
|
|