Re: Bridging the digital voice and data gap
Tyrell Berry <kd7kuj@...>
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Again, I'm not an audio engineer, and I have been wrong before... but isn't saying that the chip is a vocoder and it is not compression kind of like saying MP3 is a Muscoder and is also not compression? Is it somehow true that because someone chooses to use a different vocabulary that the principles of which I speak somehow cease to apply?
It has been said several times before, and I will agree: it's entirely possible that transcoding through back to back vocoders may produce legible audio... Only one way to find out, and I look forward to hearing recordings of the results.
On Aug 3, 2012 6:51 AM, "Bryan Hoyer" <bhhoyer@...> wrote: