Re: New Updates on Site
Mark L Friedlander <marklfriedlander@...>
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Thank you, John. I understand and agree with the idea that 56kbps speed could be supported, but due to the lack of a significant installed base, you are dedicating engineering resources to leap-frogging that particular rate, in favor of a higher delivered speed. I think faster modems rolling out as software selectable updates is particularly slick. I like that. In the meantime, I can use the UDRX440 for a 9600 packet node for less than the cost of a 440 radio and TNC.
73 Mark KV4I
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 6:02 PM, John D. Hays <john@...> wrote: