Re: No 2m but still an APRS igate?

Joshua Mesilane <josh@...>

Hi All,

I LOVE what this radio stands for. I love the fact that it will be an open source radio, but is the hardware going to be open as well? PCB design, chip code, etc? Is the project going to be completely open source & open hardware, or only partially?

As for APRS. Here in VK we primarily use the 2m network with a nation-wide frequency of 145.175 and to a much lesser degree 70cm is used typically for experimental purposes. I run a 2m IGate at home using javAPRSSrvr and the idea of having this run on the device directly I think is exciting, however:

Will the radio be designed in such a way that if we wish to contribute to the project a "2m" version could be designed?
Are the RF components modular and would they allow for swapping? (So that third parties could easily design and produce open hardware alternative RF boards)
Is there any hope for an RS-232 port?

USB-Serial/USB devices in general are notoriously bad for crashing and rebooting in RF environments which can easily cause the serial port to lock up and you then need to remove and re-plug the serial port. I'm not so sure that I'd want to use my NMEA GPS via a USB/Serial adaptor (Or even an FTDI USB GPS) if it were going to be hard wired into a mobile installation. In that environment (IMO and in the field experience) RS232 is the only way to go. In some applications (Remote telemetry systems - And we're not just talking about HAM radio now) quite a lot of gear still uses RS232. I can see a MUCH wider use for this radio if the cost can be kept low, if it has interchangeable/configurable RF stage an RS232 capability. You could even aim for certification of the RF boards to comply with govt standards and market the product as an "open" alternative to the proprietary telemetry/data radios currently on the market.


On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:37 AM, richark <richark@...> wrote:

I don't think there is a 'universal' APRS channel for 70cm, like 144.39 is for 2m. Here in the Northwest, we use 440.800 for 9k6 APRS.

Not sure how official this list is, but it provides other alternatives around the world.

Kenny, KU7M

--- In UniversalDigitalRadio@..., Sander Pool wrote:
> I will tune my igate to 445.925 and see what I pick up over the next few
> days. Near as I can tell all local (CT/NY area) users are on 144.390 but
> maybe I'm missing out on a lot of traffic. I will also run my mobiles on
> that frequency to see if any other igates are listening. I don't think
> igates announce their frequency but if non-144.390 is common in the US
> it should probably be included so you can see on and other servers.
> 73,
> Sander W1SOP
> On 5/22/2012 2:01 PM, Perry Chamberlain wrote:
> > The 440 aprs packet frequency used is 445.925. In some areas, its dead
> > quiet, in some its packed.
> > But there are 440 freqs to use aprs. It just means you have better
> > propagation, no collisions and as long as your igated, it goes to the
> > WEB apr IS.

Join to automatically receive all group messages.