Date   
Re: blueDV; Windows 7 & ThumbDV 3000

Cal N9KO
 

You must issue a 4000 Group call  before you go to a second TG. Try that.  If that does not take care of the "negative lock" then I would uninstall blueDV and reinstall it. Every time you start blueDV you will need to issue a link command. 

blueDV; Windows 7 & ThumbDV 3000

Douglas F. Enoch
 

Can someone help?  I have a 2.2 GHz Lap Top; Windows 7; blueDV latest version(09499); a new ThumbDV 3000.  When I installed it:  (1) it transmitted and received on group 3100 the first time but not the second time?? (2) it did still receive 3100. (3) rechecked all settings.  (4) then switched to Tac 311 which it displayed but it still received 3100?? (5)  Switched back to 3100 but Now the Prompt says “negative Lock”?? (6) It will not lock on anything??   The only video for this installation is from England not US and is not complete info on all Boxes.  Also requires info not supplied??  Is there a written install list or better video?  Please reply if you have a suggestion.  I am 71, disabled and visually impaired.  73,  Doug…KD8YVD   doug.enoch@...

Re: Setting up D-STAR repeater

Jim Kusznir
 

thanks to both of you!  

As it stands, I have also been an unofficial advisor to W7UQ when they needed some help getting back on their feet.  I've spent many hours in both club's shacks, and we have a pretty good and friendly relationship.

I'll get them started on the pi repeater gateway.

--Jim

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 7:58 AM, John D Hays - K7VE <john@...> wrote:
Yes.  You can use ircddbgateway with a Raspberry Pi -- see https://nw-digital-radio.groups.io/g/udrc/wiki/Configuring-ircDDBgateway#A-Repeater-on-an-Icom-ID-RP2C

I used to belong to the W7UQ club, but won't hold that against you :)

I would be glad to help you sort it out.

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 7:30 AM, Jim Kusznir <jkusznir@...> wrote:
Hi all:

I'm helping mentor a college ham club that has an Icom D-STAR repeater hardware (UHF radio module + controller) that was at one time a full D-STAR repeater.  Years ago, the networking and matching server got disturbed, and it has been operating in "standalone" mode for quite some time.  

The specifics of the repeater location means that traditional servers located at the "tower site" are inappropriate, so the generation of students who got it up did some "network magic" and got it tunneled back to a data center where a VM ran the D-STAR repeater.  I remember getting the software and required networking in place was quite a challenge.

Now, I understand that there are additional options available, possibly even options that allow using a Raspberry Pi as the D-STAR server.  Is this correct?  Can others point me to where to get the server software (any variants -- Icom or 3rd party) that would work with the Icom repeater hardware?

Thanks!
--Jim, K7LL
advisor to W7YH WSU Amateur Radio Club Rho Epsilon




--


John D. Hays
Edmonds, WA
K7VE

   


Re: UDRX ???

 

Marc -- the UDRX project had languished for too long and has been discontinued.  The current focus of NW Digital Radio is outlined here -- http://nwdigitalradio.com/2018-state-of-the-union/  

This decision was not taken lightly.  Rest assured we are still interested in providing solutions in the space that the UDRX envisioned and we will have future products in the space, but likely taking a different approach.

Right now we are working on projects outlined in the "State of the Union", some of which will be available for view at Hamvention in a couple of weeks.

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 9:16 AM, Marc Lacy <KD7RYY@...> wrote:
I see on the website that the UDRX is no longer listed. What has happened?


--


John D. Hays
Director

  

UDRX ???

Marc Lacy
 

I see on the website that the UDRX is no longer listed. What has happened?

Re: Setting up D-STAR repeater

 

Yes.  You can use ircddbgateway with a Raspberry Pi -- see https://nw-digital-radio.groups.io/g/udrc/wiki/Configuring-ircDDBgateway#A-Repeater-on-an-Icom-ID-RP2C

I used to belong to the W7UQ club, but won't hold that against you :)

I would be glad to help you sort it out.

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 7:30 AM, Jim Kusznir <jkusznir@...> wrote:
Hi all:

I'm helping mentor a college ham club that has an Icom D-STAR repeater hardware (UHF radio module + controller) that was at one time a full D-STAR repeater.  Years ago, the networking and matching server got disturbed, and it has been operating in "standalone" mode for quite some time.  

The specifics of the repeater location means that traditional servers located at the "tower site" are inappropriate, so the generation of students who got it up did some "network magic" and got it tunneled back to a data center where a VM ran the D-STAR repeater.  I remember getting the software and required networking in place was quite a challenge.

Now, I understand that there are additional options available, possibly even options that allow using a Raspberry Pi as the D-STAR server.  Is this correct?  Can others point me to where to get the server software (any variants -- Icom or 3rd party) that would work with the Icom repeater hardware?

Thanks!
--Jim, K7LL
advisor to W7YH WSU Amateur Radio Club Rho Epsilon




--


John D. Hays
Edmonds, WA
K7VE

   

Setting up D-STAR repeater

Jim Kusznir
 

Hi all:

I'm helping mentor a college ham club that has an Icom D-STAR repeater hardware (UHF radio module + controller) that was at one time a full D-STAR repeater.  Years ago, the networking and matching server got disturbed, and it has been operating in "standalone" mode for quite some time.  

The specifics of the repeater location means that traditional servers located at the "tower site" are inappropriate, so the generation of students who got it up did some "network magic" and got it tunneled back to a data center where a VM ran the D-STAR repeater.  I remember getting the software and required networking in place was quite a challenge.

Now, I understand that there are additional options available, possibly even options that allow using a Raspberry Pi as the D-STAR server.  Is this correct?  Can others point me to where to get the server software (any variants -- Icom or 3rd party) that would work with the Icom repeater hardware?

Thanks!
--Jim, K7LL
advisor to W7YH WSU Amateur Radio Club Rho Epsilon

locked Re: D-STAR AT DAYTON HAMVENTION(R) 2018

hdk1220@...
 

Thank you

Harvey
Harvey Kolodner
WA3GTL

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018, 2:32 PM John D Hays - K7VE <john@...> wrote:
People can carry their torch all they want -- the point is, NW Digital Radio is not the inventor of D-STAR or AMBE and this is just unwarranted noise here.  I don't want people to unsubscribe from this list, which is a communication vehicle for NW Digital Radio company and their users, for too much noise.

As pointed out, all sorts of proprietary technology is in every modern piece of equipment we use.  Remember, even FM and SSB were patented (proprietary technology).

If people want to continue this debate, please move it to an appropriate list.



On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Steve McGrane <temporarilyoffline@...> wrote:
Ultimately, somebody has to speak to the unpopular things.  Sure, its
a lot of noise, but at the end of the day, the rules say something to
the effect of "no coded transmissions" and "no pecuniary interest".

I "get" what he's saying/trying to do and I appreciate that somebody
is carrying the torch.

How many of us have an iPad 1 that is just about completely useless
these days?  Imagine if it was an open platform and you could load a
functional OS on it and keep on browsing the internet and playing
videos? (Without being labeled a criminal)

I have enough dead apple gear sitting on shelves that I won't buy
anymore of it, even if I have to pay extra to get something from
somebody else.

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 12:24 PM, Tony <w7efs@...> wrote:
> It appeared to me that someone had an AMBE "chip" on their shoulder, and it
> isn't you, Bob.
>

--


John D. Hays
Director


locked Re: D-STAR AT DAYTON HAMVENTION(R) 2018

 

People can carry their torch all they want -- the point is, NW Digital Radio is not the inventor of D-STAR or AMBE and this is just unwarranted noise here.  I don't want people to unsubscribe from this list, which is a communication vehicle for NW Digital Radio company and their users, for too much noise.

As pointed out, all sorts of proprietary technology is in every modern piece of equipment we use.  Remember, even FM and SSB were patented (proprietary technology).

If people want to continue this debate, please move it to an appropriate list.



On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Steve McGrane <temporarilyoffline@...> wrote:
Ultimately, somebody has to speak to the unpopular things.  Sure, its
a lot of noise, but at the end of the day, the rules say something to
the effect of "no coded transmissions" and "no pecuniary interest".

I "get" what he's saying/trying to do and I appreciate that somebody
is carrying the torch.

How many of us have an iPad 1 that is just about completely useless
these days?  Imagine if it was an open platform and you could load a
functional OS on it and keep on browsing the internet and playing
videos? (Without being labeled a criminal)

I have enough dead apple gear sitting on shelves that I won't buy
anymore of it, even if I have to pay extra to get something from
somebody else.

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 12:24 PM, Tony <w7efs@...> wrote:
> It appeared to me that someone had an AMBE "chip" on their shoulder, and it
> isn't you, Bob.
>

--


John D. Hays
Director


locked Re: D-STAR AT DAYTON HAMVENTION(R) 2018

Steve McGrane <temporarilyoffline@...>
 

Ultimately, somebody has to speak to the unpopular things. Sure, its
a lot of noise, but at the end of the day, the rules say something to
the effect of "no coded transmissions" and "no pecuniary interest".

I "get" what he's saying/trying to do and I appreciate that somebody
is carrying the torch.

How many of us have an iPad 1 that is just about completely useless
these days? Imagine if it was an open platform and you could load a
functional OS on it and keep on browsing the internet and playing
videos? (Without being labeled a criminal)

I have enough dead apple gear sitting on shelves that I won't buy
anymore of it, even if I have to pay extra to get something from
somebody else.

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 12:24 PM, Tony <w7efs@...> wrote:
It appeared to me that someone had an AMBE "chip" on their shoulder, and it
isn't you, Bob.

On 04/30/2018 10:19 AM, w6kd via Groups.Io wrote:

I'm always amused when somebody comes in and, throwing around the nebulus
"spirit of ham radio" as if they were appointed the High Priest of The
Spirit by Hiram Percy Maxim himself, proposes to tell the rest of us how it
is.

This sort of absolutism serves no useful purpose in the real
world...certainly the thousands of us using many kinds of gear with all
sorts of proprietary or patented ICs embedded (DSP chips, GPS modules,
signal processors, etc) aren't particularly worried about what the Grinch of
Ham Radio thinks or says.

Regards

Bob, W6KD


locked Re: D-STAR AT DAYTON HAMVENTION(R) 2018

Tony <w7efs@...>
 

It appeared to me that someone had an AMBE "chip" on their shoulder, and it isn't you, Bob.

On 04/30/2018 10:19 AM, w6kd via Groups.Io wrote:
I'm always amused when somebody comes in and, throwing around the nebulus "spirit of ham radio" as if they were appointed the High Priest of The Spirit by Hiram Percy Maxim himself, proposes to tell the rest of us how it is.

This sort of absolutism serves no useful purpose in the real world...certainly the thousands of us using many kinds of gear with all sorts of proprietary or patented ICs embedded (DSP chips, GPS modules, signal processors, etc) aren't particularly worried about what the Grinch of Ham Radio thinks or says.

Regards

Bob, W6KD

locked Re: D-STAR AT DAYTON HAMVENTION(R) 2018

w6kd@...
 

I'm always amused when somebody comes in and, throwing around the nebulus "spirit of ham radio" as if they were appointed the High Priest of The Spirit by Hiram Percy Maxim himself, proposes to tell the rest of us how it is.

This sort of absolutism serves no useful purpose in the real world...certainly the thousands of us using many kinds of gear with all sorts of proprietary or patented ICs embedded (DSP chips, GPS modules, signal processors, etc) aren't particularly worried about what the Grinch of Ham Radio thinks or says.

Regards

Bob, W6KD

locked Re: D-STAR AT DAYTON HAMVENTION(R) 2018

Brad NK8J <bradnk8j@...>
 

On 4/29/2018 8:59 PM, Kenneth Hendrickson via Groups.Io wrote:
--------------------------------------------
On Sun, 4/29/18, John D Hays - K7VE <@john_hays> wrote:
Ken, I
don't know what you are talking about.
You are still in denial.

The physical
layer is the radio circuit and applied modulation, on D-STAR
that is GMSK.
GMSK is a *family* of possible PHY layer implementations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum-shift_keying#Gaussian_minimum-shift_keying
What is T? Where is it specified?

It isn't specified anyplace.

NOT fully published.
Therefore, NOT open.  NOT free (as in freedom).
Still CLOSED and PROPRIETARY.
Still NOT in the spirit of amateur radio.

73,
Ken N8KH

locked Re: D-STAR AT DAYTON HAMVENTION(R) 2018

 

There are open source implementations of the gateway. Ircddbgateway and qnetgateway, for example. 

Over 10 years ago a D-STAR radio was built and demoed based on available information. 

Anyway, this is probably a discussion for a D-STAR forum, father than a general discussion group for NW Digital Radio. 

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018, 17:59 Matthew Pitts via Groups.Io <daywalker_blade_2004=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:

I suspect he's thinking of the Gateway side of things, which is isn't documented.


Matthew Pitts

N8OHU


On 4/29/2018 8:42 PM, John D Hays - K7VE wrote:
Ken, I don't know what you are talking about.  The physical layer is the radio circuit and applied modulation, on D-STAR that is GMSK.  


On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 5:30 PM, Kenneth Hendrickson via Groups.Io <dsp_stap@...> wrote:

--------------------------------------------
On Sun, 4/29/18, John D Hays - K7VE <john@...> wrote:
> The protocols are
> published, the latest revision is in Japanese, but it is
> published and has been for years.
> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/D-STAR.pdf

Nope.

Still *NOTHING* about the physical layer.
Therefore, NOT fully published.

Therefore, NOT open.  NOT free (as in freedom).
Still CLOSED and PROPRIETARY.

Still NOT in the spirit of amateur radio.

73,
Ken N8KH

PS  When there are "reverse engineering" attempts published on the Internet, you KNOW that it is not fully open.  You don't have to reverse engineer an open protocol, because it is fully described in published documents.  No such documents exist for D-STAR.  Such reverse engineering attempts DO exist.







--


John D. Hays
Edmonds, WA
K7VE

   


locked Re: D-STAR AT DAYTON HAMVENTION(R) 2018

Kenneth Hendrickson
 

--------------------------------------------
On Sun, 4/29/18, Matthew Pitts via Groups.Io <daywalker_blade_2004=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:
I suspect he's thinking of the Gateway side of
things, which is
isn't documented.
As long as there is *even one thing* not published, not documented, it isn't free (as in freedom), and it isn't open.

73,
Ken N8KH

locked Re: D-STAR AT DAYTON HAMVENTION(R) 2018

 

I suspect he's thinking of the Gateway side of things, which is isn't documented.


Matthew Pitts

N8OHU


On 4/29/2018 8:42 PM, John D Hays - K7VE wrote:
Ken, I don't know what you are talking about.  The physical layer is the radio circuit and applied modulation, on D-STAR that is GMSK.  


On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 5:30 PM, Kenneth Hendrickson via Groups.Io <dsp_stap@...> wrote:

--------------------------------------------
On Sun, 4/29/18, John D Hays - K7VE <john@...> wrote:
> The protocols are
> published, the latest revision is in Japanese, but it is
> published and has been for years.
> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/D-STAR.pdf

Nope.

Still *NOTHING* about the physical layer.
Therefore, NOT fully published.

Therefore, NOT open.  NOT free (as in freedom).
Still CLOSED and PROPRIETARY.

Still NOT in the spirit of amateur radio.

73,
Ken N8KH

PS  When there are "reverse engineering" attempts published on the Internet, you KNOW that it is not fully open.  You don't have to reverse engineer an open protocol, because it is fully described in published documents.  No such documents exist for D-STAR.  Such reverse engineering attempts DO exist.







--


John D. Hays
Edmonds, WA
K7VE

   


locked Re: D-STAR AT DAYTON HAMVENTION(R) 2018

Kenneth Hendrickson
 

--------------------------------------------
On Sun, 4/29/18, John D Hays - K7VE <@john_hays> wrote:
Ken, I
don't know what you are talking about.
You are still in denial.

The physical
layer is the radio circuit and applied modulation, on D-STAR
that is GMSK.
GMSK is a *family* of possible PHY layer implementations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum-shift_keying#Gaussian_minimum-shift_keying
What is T? Where is it specified?

It isn't specified anyplace.

NOT fully published.
Therefore, NOT open.  NOT free (as in freedom).
Still CLOSED and PROPRIETARY.
Still NOT in the spirit of amateur radio.

73,
Ken N8KH

locked Re: D-STAR AT DAYTON HAMVENTION(R) 2018

 

Ken, I don't know what you are talking about.  The physical layer is the radio circuit and applied modulation, on D-STAR that is GMSK.  


On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 5:30 PM, Kenneth Hendrickson via Groups.Io <dsp_stap@...> wrote:

--------------------------------------------
On Sun, 4/29/18, John D Hays - K7VE <john@...> wrote:
> The protocols are
> published, the latest revision is in Japanese, but it is
> published and has been for years.
> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/D-STAR.pdf

Nope.

Still *NOTHING* about the physical layer.
Therefore, NOT fully published.

Therefore, NOT open.  NOT free (as in freedom).
Still CLOSED and PROPRIETARY.

Still NOT in the spirit of amateur radio.

73,
Ken N8KH

PS  When there are "reverse engineering" attempts published on the Internet, you KNOW that it is not fully open.  You don't have to reverse engineer an open protocol, because it is fully described in published documents.  No such documents exist for D-STAR.  Such reverse engineering attempts DO exist.







--


John D. Hays
Edmonds, WA
K7VE

   

locked Re: D-STAR AT DAYTON HAMVENTION(R) 2018

Kenneth Hendrickson
 

--------------------------------------------
On Sun, 4/29/18, John D Hays - K7VE <@john_hays> wrote:
The protocols are
published, the latest revision is in Japanese, but it is
published and has been for years.
http://www.arrl.org/files/file/D-STAR.pdf
Nope.

Still *NOTHING* about the physical layer.
Therefore, NOT fully published.

Therefore, NOT open. NOT free (as in freedom).
Still CLOSED and PROPRIETARY.

Still NOT in the spirit of amateur radio.

73,
Ken N8KH

PS When there are "reverse engineering" attempts published on the Internet, you KNOW that it is not fully open. You don't have to reverse engineer an open protocol, because it is fully described in published documents. No such documents exist for D-STAR. Such reverse engineering attempts DO exist.

locked Re: D-STAR AT DAYTON HAMVENTION(R) 2018

 

The protocols are published, the latest revision is in Japanese, but it is published and has been for years.


On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 5:14 PM, Kenneth Hendrickson via Groups.Io <dsp_stap@...> wrote:

--------------------------------------------
On Sat, 4/28/18, Woodrick, Ed <ewoodrick@...> wrote:
> D-STAR AT DAYTON HAMVENTION® 2018

Has anybody fully published *EVERYTHING* about the D-STAR protocols, including the physical layer?

To my knowledge, it has still not yet been published.

So it is still NOT open.  It is still NOT free.  It is still CLOSED AND PROPRIETARY.

That's not in the spirit of ham radio.

73,
Ken N8KH







--


John D. Hays
Edmonds, WA
K7VE