Have you tried other reflectors? Your default may be temporarily down.

If the ThumbDV works with BlueDV (or Buster), then the ThumbDV is fine. Software support is by the software author -- WinDV support is at http://www.dutch-star.eu/feedback.aspx-- John D.

worked fine for few weeks, useing Windv, left alone for 2 weeks turned back on and now "dplus connection (ref whatever) failed!) any ideas. Thumd drive still works useing Blue dv

Someone gave me a pointer and I pulled down the HTML directory zip file. Yes, they are pretty straight forward HTML files. I did not know where they were located, and I didn't see a top level "Here

Indeed. Apparently my last post was deemed inappropriate. I'll reword it... All the WE standard forms are downloadable in a zip file using the manual update

Really, did you spend more than 5 seconds looking? All the standard forms are downloadable in a zip file using the manual update process: https://winlink.org/WinlinkExpressForms Or you can pull them

Groups.io has groups and sub-groups. We use sub-groups for topics surrounding a product or major topic. In theory, discussions about AMBE products have a sub-groups as does one for UDRC & DRAWS.

I am subscribed to this group just fine (judging by the onslaught of WinLink spam, now filtered out) but I too cant see the documents as the link John posted results in a page showing a red banner at

Yeah, well… KISS to me means dedicated system that just does ONE thing. Maybe an embedded CPU of some kind running an emcomm application out of ROM (flash). If you want Linux that just does one

One more comment and I will stop. I consider myself reasonably smart and open to new ideas and new skills. I also am educated but no science beyond freshman college level and no engineering or

Not entirely true. When I first started talking to KN6KB about some things that ended up becoming part of ARDOP, he mentioned that he had been working with someone at one point that had been working

Your point is precisely why I'm in favo[u]r of open-source software, and I've been rebuffed in the winlink groups several times in the last 'arf-decade for strongly suggesting it wrt WE formerly

This is the typical issue that you run into - "Oh, we found something that works for 80% of the users (i.e., Windows), everyone else will have to use this too because it's too difficult

Hi George, That is generally true that the original forms, in their paper or PDF distributions are government created. Form handling within Winlink - the ability to send the data, but not the form

http://winlink.org/content/how_manually_update_standard_templates_version_10690 "Step 2" has the link I believe you're searching for.

In Santa Clara County, CA we use a program that works with Outpost for forms. It is called PacFORMS. A form needs a one time conversion to html. From then on, an operator merely needs to open the

As one of the hordes of EMCOMM trainees, I agree wholeheartedly with this. I have been in the EMCOMM and public service world for a long time. People have been pushing Linux based ideas at me for

What Scott is saying rings true with me bc I've taught ham classes locally and KISS is a big four letter word when it comes to my students trying get hardware to work with simple software. Most folks

From the perspective of EMCOMM leaders, forms are NOT proprietary (for the most part). The forms are part of the Incident Command System structure, and they dovetail well with all sorts of

Bud, that's an interesting solution - I've not used FL Digi forms capability. I suppose you could fun FSQ and FLMSG simultaneously. I'm wondering if the forms capability in FL Digi is compatible with