|
Re: AW: Frequencies, Band Plans and other annoyances
Both antennas right hand is ok
Only if you use moon-bounce the direction of the waves change from right to
left
Look at 2 screws (and one nut on one of them represents the signal)
If both are
Both antennas right hand is ok
Only if you use moon-bounce the direction of the waves change from right to
left
Look at 2 screws (and one nut on one of them represents the signal)
If both are
|
By
"siegfried jackstien" <siegfried.jackstien@...>
·
#449
·
|
|
Re: Updated Youtube demo of the UDR56K-4?
Actually, it's Q3 2013, which starts next month. I mean, they HAVE been taking preorders for the hardware for several months now.
Matthew Pitts
N8OHU
Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android
Actually, it's Q3 2013, which starts next month. I mean, they HAVE been taking preorders for the hardware for several months now.
Matthew Pitts
N8OHU
Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android
|
By
Matthew Pitts <daywalker_blade_2004@...>
·
#451
·
|
|
Re: Updated Youtube demo of the UDR56K-4?
There needs to be a release date (4Q 2015) or something like that, for most to start saving money. Otherwise they will probably go out and buy a WiFi router :-)
Then too, 70cm may just go away in
There needs to be a release date (4Q 2015) or something like that, for most to start saving money. Otherwise they will probably go out and buy a WiFi router :-)
Then too, 70cm may just go away in
|
By
"avignonmimi@..." <avignonmimi@...>
·
#447
·
|
|
Re: Frequencies, Band Plans and other annoyances
I was thinking one station could have right-hand, but then to communicate the next station would need left-hand (two antennas pointed at each other).
Wimo only sells right-hand, as they sell to the
I was thinking one station could have right-hand, but then to communicate the next station would need left-hand (two antennas pointed at each other).
Wimo only sells right-hand, as they sell to the
|
By
"avignonmimi@..." <avignonmimi@...>
·
#448
·
|
|
Updated Youtube demo of the UDR56K-4?
Developers,
I'm trying my hardest to spread the word about the UDR56K-4 here in CT, but many hams have adopted the "proof is in the pudding" theory.
Would it be possible to record and post an
Developers,
I'm trying my hardest to spread the word about the UDR56K-4 here in CT, but many hams have adopted the "proof is in the pudding" theory.
Would it be possible to record and post an
|
By
"Douglas" <dperv27@...>
·
#446
·
|
|
Re: Frequencies, Band Plans and other annoyances
Here in Connecticut, we don't have a published 70cm Band Plan. I've asked for our Spectrum Manager for his input, but he is out of town on business and will discuss with me when he returns. I
Here in Connecticut, we don't have a published 70cm Band Plan. I've asked for our Spectrum Manager for his input, but he is out of town on business and will discuss with me when he returns. I
|
By
"Douglas" <dperv27@...>
·
#445
·
|
|
Re: N connector Male or Female?
Female
By
"k7udr" <bhhoyer@...>
·
#443
·
|
|
N connector Male or Female?
I see the specs for the UDR56K specify "RF Connector: Type N" but is it male or is it female?
Thanks,
Mark KV4I
I see the specs for the UDR56K specify "RF Connector: Type N" but is it male or is it female?
Thanks,
Mark KV4I
|
By
"marklfriedlander" <marklfriedlander@...>
·
#442
·
|
|
Re: Frequencies, Band Plans and other annoyances
Bryan,
I'm in the Charleston, SC area. While I haven't had any issues personally with channelization in the 70cm band, I would have to consult with the governing body before I open my mouth and say
Bryan,
I'm in the Charleston, SC area. While I haven't had any issues personally with channelization in the 70cm band, I would have to consult with the governing body before I open my mouth and say
|
By
"brad_ka3yan" <bradm75@...>
·
#441
·
|
|
Re: Frequencies, Band Plans and other annoyances
The only problem might be whether to use Left or Right circular as there's 30 dB's attenuation between the two.
The IARU recommends using Right-hand Circular, see 8.8.7 of the VHF Handboook
The only problem might be whether to use Left or Right circular as there's 30 dB's attenuation between the two.
The IARU recommends using Right-hand Circular, see 8.8.7 of the VHF Handboook
|
By
M5AKA <m5aka@...>
·
#444
·
|
|
Re: Frequencies, Band Plans and other annoyances
East and West coasts could be a problem with Navy/USAF radars. The USAF created a UHF ham-free zone around the west coast Pave Paw radar.
Kantronics built their data radio for the 430 band back in
East and West coasts could be a problem with Navy/USAF radars. The USAF created a UHF ham-free zone around the west coast Pave Paw radar.
Kantronics built their data radio for the 430 band back in
|
By
"avignonmimi@..." <avignonmimi@...>
·
#440
·
|
|
Re: TCP/IP Over Packet
I'm scratching my head for memory, but I seem to recall setting the MTU to 4 times the PACLEN so that only one TCP and one AX.25 overhead packet was sent, and the other 3 packets were just data. This
I'm scratching my head for memory, but I seem to recall setting the MTU to 4 times the PACLEN so that only one TCP and one AX.25 overhead packet was sent, and the other 3 packets were just data. This
|
By
"avignonmimi@..." <avignonmimi@...>
·
#439
·
|
|
Re: Frequencies, Band Plans and other annoyances
In europe it should be no problem, region one has about 200 khz for duplex/relais packet, 400 khz simplex packet, and 3 all mode sections, one 500 khz, one 400 khz and one 600 khz, offcourse the all
In europe it should be no problem, region one has about 200 khz for duplex/relais packet, 400 khz simplex packet, and 3 all mode sections, one 500 khz, one 400 khz and one 600 khz, offcourse the all
|
By
PE1RDW <pe1rdw@...>
·
#438
·
|
|
Frequencies, Band Plans and other annoyances
As we move forward to deployment, it occurs to me that the landscape for operating frequencies is anything but stable.
Here in Western Washington we have 19 - 25kHz simplex channels designated as
As we move forward to deployment, it occurs to me that the landscape for operating frequencies is anything but stable.
Here in Western Washington we have 19 - 25kHz simplex channels designated as
|
By
"k7udr" <bhhoyer@...>
·
#437
·
|
|
Re: TCP/IP Over Packet
I seem to remember that we were using 1024-byte packets over 9600 baud in the Seattle area on TCP/IP back in the early 90's, and UI frames.
As soon as I get a box in my hand I'll be trying to do the
I seem to remember that we were using 1024-byte packets over 9600 baud in the Seattle area on TCP/IP back in the early 90's, and UI frames.
As soon as I get a box in my hand I'll be trying to do the
|
By
"Curt, WE7U" <curt.we7u@...>
·
#435
·
|
|
Re: TCP/IP Over Packet
You will be able to use DD on the UDR either as an Ethernet bridge (with TCP/IP as the encapsulated protocol) or setup each UDR as a router with the DD bridge between them.
The router approach is
You will be able to use DD on the UDR either as an Ethernet bridge (with TCP/IP as the encapsulated protocol) or setup each UDR as a router with the DD bridge between them.
The router approach is
|
By
"John D. Hays" <john@...>
·
#434
·
|
|
Re: TCP/IP Over Packet
Your comment about D-star DD for TCP/IP interests me. Being a D-star newby, how difficult will it be to setup a TCP/IP bridge between two network segments (on the same subnet)using the
Your comment about D-star DD for TCP/IP interests me. Being a D-star newby, how difficult will it be to setup a TCP/IP bridge between two network segments (on the same subnet)using the
|
By
"Steve" <ve7cbh@...>
·
#433
·
|
|
TCP/IP Over Packet
Questions that came in via email. Thanks to John for responding
Is it possible to use TCP-IP over ax25 with large MTU ?
The UDR56K implements the Linux AX.25 stack using a socket interface. Each
Questions that came in via email. Thanks to John for responding
Is it possible to use TCP-IP over ax25 with large MTU ?
The UDR56K implements the Linux AX.25 stack using a socket interface. Each
|
By
"k7udr" <bhhoyer@...>
·
#432
·
|
|
Re: Software interface to UDR56K
Hello,
I am interested in several project using the udr56k.
The first is testing several types of forward error correction at the higher speeds.
I what to find what works best so that we can use 56k
Hello,
I am interested in several project using the udr56k.
The first is testing several types of forward error correction at the higher speeds.
I what to find what works best so that we can use 56k
|
By
Marshall Denny <MarshallDenny@...>
·
#431
·
|
|
Re: Software interface to UDR56K
Hi Marshall,
Everyone is heads down leading up to Dayton.
What type of software are you planning. It may help us understand what priorities our customers have for writing software?
Hi Marshall,
Everyone is heads down leading up to Dayton.
What type of software are you planning. It may help us understand what priorities our customers have for writing software?
|
By
"John" <john@...>
·
#430
·
|