|
Re: Webmail Clients
Michael:
I think you make my point rather eloquently, when you conflate RAID
storage and an Amateur Radio network. In my experience, if you're
talking about RAID storage, such usage trends more
Michael:
I think you make my point rather eloquently, when you conflate RAID
storage and an Amateur Radio network. In my experience, if you're
talking about RAID storage, such usage trends more
|
By
Steve Stroh N8GNJ <steve.n8gnj@...>
·
#584
·
|
|
Re: Webmail Clients
For those who missed it - start at minute 5:15 in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0svcHERWrM
We have since reworked the whole RF section for much better performance, and have new management code.
For those who missed it - start at minute 5:15 in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0svcHERWrM
We have since reworked the whole RF section for much better performance, and have new management code.
|
By
"John D. Hays" <john@...>
·
#583
·
|
|
Re: Webmail Clients
What do you think the Node.js and Socket.io stuff that John talked about at DCC last fall is for? Besides, they had working prototypes at Dayton in 2012.
Matthew Pitts
N8OHU
--
Sent from my Android
What do you think the Node.js and Socket.io stuff that John talked about at DCC last fall is for? Besides, they had working prototypes at Dayton in 2012.
Matthew Pitts
N8OHU
--
Sent from my Android
|
By
Matthew Pitts <daywalker_blade_2004@...>
·
#582
·
|
|
Re: Webmail Clients
You missed the point.
My point is that all this time spent on defining applications could and should be spent on defining management/configuration screens, status screens, logging, etc. for the
You missed the point.
My point is that all this time spent on defining applications could and should be spent on defining management/configuration screens, status screens, logging, etc. for the
|
By
"Michael E Fox - N6MEF" <n6mef@...>
·
#581
·
|
|
New Post on Site
http://nwdigitalradio.com/dds-success
http://nwdigitalradio.com/dds-success
|
By
john@...
·
#580
·
|
|
Re: Webmail Clients
Bryan:
SquirrelMail at least the last time I was forced to use it 5+ years
ago, is, at best, adequate. But there's got to be something better. As
a result of the infestation of Google+ into Gmail,
Bryan:
SquirrelMail at least the last time I was forced to use it 5+ years
ago, is, at best, adequate. But there's got to be something better. As
a result of the infestation of Google+ into Gmail,
|
By
Steve Stroh N8GNJ <steve.n8gnj@...>
·
#579
·
|
|
Re: Webmail Clients
+1
Well, we'll try to at least.
While being a primarily a (S)IMAP user, I appreciate having a webmail client to fall back on. No preference really, as, for me it is only ever a fallback. I think
+1
Well, we'll try to at least.
While being a primarily a (S)IMAP user, I appreciate having a webmail client to fall back on. No preference really, as, for me it is only ever a fallback. I think
|
By
John Ronan <jpronans@...>
·
#578
·
|
|
Re: Webmail Clients
Uc Berkeley. I can forword any message on to the ee email list down here. Great group they all just got wookfong hts, the first assinment is aprs email clints... Moving on to sdr dsp work. This devise
Uc Berkeley. I can forword any message on to the ee email list down here. Great group they all just got wookfong hts, the first assinment is aprs email clints... Moving on to sdr dsp work. This devise
|
By
Mathison Ott <mathisono@...>
·
#577
·
|
|
Re: Webmail Clients
Hi Matt,
I get down to the Bay Area from time to time, which University are you associated with?
Bryan K7UDR
Hi Matt,
I get down to the Bay Area from time to time, which University are you associated with?
Bryan K7UDR
|
By
bhhoyer@...
·
#576
·
|
|
Re: Webmail Clients
Some of the ee, students are interested in the unit. After our 87+ licensing exam last week. Is any one around in the bay area that could give a talk about the devise?
73 kj6dzb mathison
Some of the ee, students are interested in the unit. After our 87+ licensing exam last week. Is any one around in the bay area that could give a talk about the devise?
73 kj6dzb mathison
|
By
Mathison Ott <mathisono@...>
·
#575
·
|
|
Re: Webmail Clients
"However, we also have customers who need to be able to take the radio out of the box, set a few configuration settings and operate. "
Did somebody call my name? Definitely build something for us
"However, we also have customers who need to be able to take the radio out of the box, set a few configuration settings and operate. "
Did somebody call my name? Definitely build something for us
|
By
Mark L Friedlander <marklfriedlander@...>
·
#574
·
|
|
Re: Webmail Clients
Just to be clear:
The hardware interface will be a posix network interface.
It can & has been bolted on to the bottom of AX.25 & TCP/IP.
What ever protocol you want to use needs to talk to a network
Just to be clear:
The hardware interface will be a posix network interface.
It can & has been bolted on to the bottom of AX.25 & TCP/IP.
What ever protocol you want to use needs to talk to a network
|
By
basil@...
·
#573
·
|
|
Re: Webmail Clients
Understand that we are the servant of two masters. Those of you that just want a modem on a network, and appliance operators who need a complete turn-key solution.
You can rest assured that no
Understand that we are the servant of two masters. Those of you that just want a modem on a network, and appliance operators who need a complete turn-key solution.
You can rest assured that no
|
By
bhhoyer@...
·
#572
·
|
|
Re: Webmail Clients
Michael,
Different team members work on different aspects of the radio. All of the things you list are being worked on by the engineers who have that responsibility.
We have more than one type of
Michael,
Different team members work on different aspects of the radio. All of the things you list are being worked on by the engineers who have that responsibility.
We have more than one type of
|
By
"John D. Hays" <john@...>
·
#571
·
|
|
Re: Webmail Clients
Exactly.
The focus seems to continue to wander. We can make mail servers and clients on some other machine at any time.
What we don’t have is the radio bridge functionality that the UDR
Exactly.
The focus seems to continue to wander. We can make mail servers and clients on some other machine at any time.
What we don’t have is the radio bridge functionality that the UDR
|
By
"Michael E Fox - N6MEF" <n6mef@...>
·
#570
·
|
|
Re: Webmail Clients
Yes, IQ via UDP will be supported for "soft modem" development.
Yes, IQ via UDP will be supported for "soft modem" development.
|
By
Bryan Hoyer <bhhoyer@...>
·
#569
·
|
|
Re: Webmail Clients
IP - SSH maybe for local (non RF - after all it's HAM Radio) admin but
it won't be needed. Plug in the box. It does a DHCP query on the
network to get an address and it's on the air.
For legacy
IP - SSH maybe for local (non RF - after all it's HAM Radio) admin but
it won't be needed. Plug in the box. It does a DHCP query on the
network to get an address and it's on the air.
For legacy
|
By
Bill Vodall <wa7nwp@...>
·
#567
·
|
|
Re: Webmail Clients
I was thinking more like TCP/IP. Maybe Linux AX25 for the 9600 stuff,
though I'm not a huge fan of AX25. SSH is a layer 7 protocol; a modem
should convert between layer 1 and layer 2.
I already have
I was thinking more like TCP/IP. Maybe Linux AX25 for the 9600 stuff,
though I'm not a huge fan of AX25. SSH is a layer 7 protocol; a modem
should convert between layer 1 and layer 2.
I already have
|
By
Tom Hayward <esarfl@...>
·
#568
·
|
|
Re: Webmail Clients
when you say "linked via ethernet" I assume you mean SSH?
and by "modem" you mean KISS?
when you say "linked via ethernet" I assume you mean SSH?
and by "modem" you mean KISS?
|
By
bhhoyer@...
·
#565
·
|
|
Re: Webmail Clients
Interesting that you mention Markdown - it appears to be showing up more..
Didn't you mean to say NNTP? That's how the cool BBS's (like JNOS
and BPQ) deal with Bulletins.
Interesting that you mention Markdown - it appears to be showing up more..
Didn't you mean to say NNTP? That's how the cool BBS's (like JNOS
and BPQ) deal with Bulletins.
|
By
Bill Vodall <wa7nwp@...>
·
#566
·
|