|
Re: compatible with DD-WRT?
Hummm.... Connecting the DD-WRT to the Ethernet port would work fine...I'm wondering if you used the Open-WRT with the mesh routing, if then you could mesh all the other UDR56K's on the network? If
|
Hummm.... Connecting the DD-WRT to the Ethernet port would work fine...I'm wondering if you used the Open-WRT with the mesh routing, if then you could mesh all the other UDR56K's on the network? If
|
By
steve <stevewa206@...>
·
#120
·
|
|
Re: compatible with DD-WRT?
David,
I'm wondering what you are looking for in "compatibility"?
The UDR56K certainly should work through a router running DD-WRT or OpenWRT.
One could port DD-WRT to the UDR56K, but to what purpose?
|
David,
I'm wondering what you are looking for in "compatibility"?
The UDR56K certainly should work through a router running DD-WRT or OpenWRT.
One could port DD-WRT to the UDR56K, but to what purpose?
|
By
"John D. Hays" <john@...>
·
#118
·
|
|
compatible with DD-WRT?
Do you have any plans to be compatible with DD-WRT?
Thank you,
David, W2LNX
|
Do you have any plans to be compatible with DD-WRT?
Thank you,
David, W2LNX
|
By
"w2lnx" <david.bern@...>
·
#117
·
|
|
Re: Screen shots
I'll post an app note on using the UDR56K with the Winlink system next week, including screen shots.
Bryan
|
I'll post an app note on using the UDR56K with the Winlink system next week, including screen shots.
Bryan
|
By
"k7udr" <bhhoyer@...>
·
#116
·
|
|
Screen shots
Are there any screen shots of the Universal Radio software?
Greg
|
Are there any screen shots of the Universal Radio software?
Greg
|
By
"kgregc" <kgregc@...>
·
#115
·
|
|
Re: Cross linking (Was: Codec2)
The specification for the preamble is pretty simple, and I reckon could be implemented easily by an experienced software developer, you'd only need an NCO I reckon. If someone were to implement such a
|
The specification for the preamble is pretty simple, and I reckon could be implemented easily by an experienced software developer, you'd only need an NCO I reckon. If someone were to implement such a
|
By
Jonathan Naylor <naylorjs@...>
·
#114
·
|
|
Re: Cross linking (Was: Codec2)
The D-STAR specification has a solution to this "non-issue" -- it involves a little MSK preamble on analog transmissions.
http://www.d-star.asia/misc/shogen_4_2_8.pdf
It seems in it's simplest form,
|
The D-STAR specification has a solution to this "non-issue" -- it involves a little MSK preamble on analog transmissions.
http://www.d-star.asia/misc/shogen_4_2_8.pdf
It seems in it's simplest form,
|
By
"John" <john@...>
·
#113
·
|
|
AW: Cross linking (Was: Codec2)
What we would need in the echolink system ist hat you can announce yourself
to the system with a dtmf number ...
Example you are not at home but mobile in the range of any echolink node
Give that
|
What we would need in the echolink system ist hat you can announce yourself
to the system with a dtmf number ...
Example you are not at home but mobile in the range of any echolink node
Give that
|
By
"siegfried jackstien" <siegfried.jackstien@...>
·
#111
·
|
|
Re: Cross linking (Was: Codec2)
I'm not sure where Australia stands on
this. What I do know is that repeaters here are
all considered "open", in that they must be
available to all amateurs whose licence allows
them access to the
|
I'm not sure where Australia stands on
this. What I do know is that repeaters here are
all considered "open", in that they must be
available to all amateurs whose licence allows
them access to the
|
By
"Tony Langdon, VK3JED" <vk3jed@...>
·
#112
·
|
|
Re: Cross linking (Was: Codec2)
At the end of the day, all that the majority of
people want to be able to do is talk to their
friends around the world, and not have to jump
through political hoops to do so.
Similar observations in
|
At the end of the day, all that the majority of
people want to be able to do is talk to their
friends around the world, and not have to jump
through political hoops to do so.
Similar observations in
|
By
"Tony Langdon, VK3JED" <vk3jed@...>
·
#110
·
|
|
Re: Cross linking (Was: Codec2)
A key issue identified many years ago is that control over what sort of traffic should be allowed to pass through a gateway should be in hands of the administrator of that particular gateway/repeater.
|
A key issue identified many years ago is that control over what sort of traffic should be allowed to pass through a gateway should be in hands of the administrator of that particular gateway/repeater.
|
By
"Tony Langdon, VK3JED" <vk3jed@...>
·
#109
·
|
|
Re: Cross linking (Was: Codec2)
The entire “MY” call is unenforceable. It is sent in clear text, is programmed by the user and therefore is suspicious.
By default, my code does not check D-Star MY calls for one simple
|
The entire “MY” call is unenforceable. It is sent in clear text, is programmed by the user and therefore is suspicious.
By default, my code does not check D-Star MY calls for one simple
|
By
"David Lake (dlake)" <dlake@...>
·
#108
·
|
|
Re: Cross linking (Was: Codec2)
Matthew,
The truth of the matter is, for linking, it just doesn't matter. Having a proper callsign in the "MY" field only matters in two places:
1. If going through an Icom G2 gateway which looks to
|
Matthew,
The truth of the matter is, for linking, it just doesn't matter. Having a proper callsign in the "MY" field only matters in two places:
1. If going through an Icom G2 gateway which looks to
|
By
"John D. Hays" <john@...>
·
#107
·
|
|
Re: Cross linking (Was: Codec2)
John,
I think as long as the proper display is there, someone using the 1.2k gmsk modem with analog audio (or echolink with callsign pass-through) won't really be noticed. It will probably require
|
John,
I think as long as the proper display is there, someone using the 1.2k gmsk modem with analog audio (or echolink with callsign pass-through) won't really be noticed. It will probably require
|
By
Matthew Pitts <daywalker_blade_2004@...>
·
#106
·
|
|
Re: Cross linking (Was: Codec2)
John
Completely agree.
Where I’ve interworked FM to D-Star, I’ve found the results to be perfectly acceptable within the confines of Amateur Radio.
You wouldn’t want to listen to
|
John
Completely agree.
Where I’ve interworked FM to D-Star, I’ve found the results to be perfectly acceptable within the confines of Amateur Radio.
You wouldn’t want to listen to
|
By
"David Lake (dlake)" <dlake@...>
·
#105
·
|
|
Cross linking (Was: Codec2)
The argument that analog should never be linked to digital because of white noise and other artifacts forgets that Vocoders (as opposed to Codecs) like AMBE and Codec-2 are specifically looking for
|
The argument that analog should never be linked to digital because of white noise and other artifacts forgets that Vocoders (as opposed to Codecs) like AMBE and Codec-2 are specifically looking for
|
By
"John D. Hays" <john@...>
·
#104
·
|
|
Re: Codec2
Which is a good reason to be clever about how we do things. :) I'm a believer in fiddling with the signal as little as possible, for this very reason.
73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com
|
Which is a good reason to be clever about how we do things. :) I'm a believer in fiddling with the signal as little as possible, for this very reason.
73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com
|
By
"Tony Langdon, VK3JED" <vk3jed@...>
·
#103
·
|
|
Re: Codec2
Another reason to push the network translation to the edge of the network, and another reason why EchoIRLP was better than other cross network solutions at the time. If you have multi protocol
|
Another reason to push the network translation to the edge of the network, and another reason why EchoIRLP was better than other cross network solutions at the time. If you have multi protocol
|
By
"Tony Langdon, VK3JED" <vk3jed@...>
·
#102
·
|
|
Re: Codec2
Actually, there is a way, but it requires some money thrown at the problem. I have a German built DSP that is incredibly effectively at removing FM background noise. Maybe something to experiment
|
Actually, there is a way, but it requires some money thrown at the problem. I have a German built DSP that is incredibly effectively at removing FM background noise. Maybe something to experiment
|
By
"Tony Langdon, VK3JED" <vk3jed@...>
·
#101
·
|
|
Re: Codec2
True, useful in densely populated areas. Out where I am, where there's fewer repeaters and bigger distances, I'm concerned about the cost of that increased capacity - namely the effect on range,
|
True, useful in densely populated areas. Out where I am, where there's fewer repeaters and bigger distances, I'm concerned about the cost of that increased capacity - namely the effect on range,
|
By
"Tony Langdon, VK3JED" <vk3jed@...>
·
#100
·
|
