|
Re: Linux RMS - headed for digital dustbin?
I don't disagree John.
But the EmComm leaders have decided that forms save critical bandwidth over the air, and forms must be used.
Regrettably, forms are proprietary in Winlink, so EmComm leaders
I don't disagree John.
But the EmComm leaders have decided that forms save critical bandwidth over the air, and forms must be used.
Regrettably, forms are proprietary in Winlink, so EmComm leaders
|
By
Randy Neals
·
#1942
·
|
|
Re: Linux RMS - headed for digital dustbin?
I looked on the winlink site and the HTML and CSS for existing forms does not appear to be independently downloadable, nor do I see a quick link to the data only transport.
Open things up and maybe
I looked on the winlink site and the HTML and CSS for existing forms does not appear to be independently downloadable, nor do I see a quick link to the data only transport.
Open things up and maybe
|
By
John D Hays - K7VE
·
#1941
·
|
|
Re: Linux RMS - headed for digital dustbin?
Whatcom county is doing something very interesting to solve these problems and it works very well on a Rpi with a UDRC controller. We are using Fldigi with Flmsg running MT-63 2000L on VHF. Flmsg
Whatcom county is doing something very interesting to solve these problems and it works very well on a Rpi with a UDRC controller. We are using Fldigi with Flmsg running MT-63 2000L on VHF. Flmsg
|
By
Budd Churchward
·
#1940
·
|
|
Re: Linux RMS - headed for digital dustbin?
For EmComm oriented clients, there are a few key functions necessary in client software:
-Forms ie: HTML/CSS Forms creation & content-only transport
-Tactical Address Support
Outpost, Pat, Paclink
For EmComm oriented clients, there are a few key functions necessary in client software:
-Forms ie: HTML/CSS Forms creation & content-only transport
-Tactical Address Support
Outpost, Pat, Paclink
|
By
Randy Neals
·
#1939
·
|
|
Re: Linux RMS - headed for digital dustbin?
I'm going to regret wading into this, but here I go anyway....
I've been instructing EMCOMM teams on WE for quite some time now. It can be rather challenging to say the least. While the folks in this
I'm going to regret wading into this, but here I go anyway....
I've been instructing EMCOMM teams on WE for quite some time now. It can be rather challenging to say the least. While the folks in this
|
By
Scott Currie
·
#1938
·
|
|
Re: Linux RMS - headed for digital dustbin?
This is just a symptom of a larger problem, people who write software
for legacy operating systems only and don't document how their software
operates.
Really, it should not matter that Winlink
This is just a symptom of a larger problem, people who write software
for legacy operating systems only and don't document how their software
operates.
Really, it should not matter that Winlink
|
By
Stuart Longland VK4MSL
·
#1937
·
|
|
Re: Linux RMS - headed for digital dustbin?
I agree with Steve. The whole idea of Emcomm is for portability, in my opinion. I like using laptops too but I would like an option of using an OS other than WinDoze if the case arises that WinDoze
I agree with Steve. The whole idea of Emcomm is for portability, in my opinion. I like using laptops too but I would like an option of using an OS other than WinDoze if the case arises that WinDoze
|
By
sancudo
·
#1936
·
|
|
Re: Linux RMS - headed for digital dustbin?
Wine has not been ported to the ARM architecture, so NO Windoze app will work on a RPi.
Is the real challenge here a Winlink development team which is myopic in their support for various operating
Wine has not been ported to the ARM architecture, so NO Windoze app will work on a RPi.
Is the real challenge here a Winlink development team which is myopic in their support for various operating
|
By
Steve
·
#1935
·
|
|
Re: Linux RMS - headed for digital dustbin?
Scott Currie <scott.d.currie@...> writes:
Yes my apologies if anyone thought I was promoting that. You can NOT run
WE or most/any windows apps on an ARM platform under wine. I am not a
fan of
Scott Currie <scott.d.currie@...> writes:
Yes my apologies if anyone thought I was promoting that. You can NOT run
WE or most/any windows apps on an ARM platform under wine. I am not a
fan of
|
By
Basil Gunn
·
#1934
·
|
|
Re: [udrc] [nw-digital-radio] Linux RMS - headed for digital dustbin?
Scott Currie <scott.d.currie@...> writes:
Yep. If you just want messaging then the options I mentioned will work
if you need to use Winlink Express features then go with Windows.
You could use
Scott Currie <scott.d.currie@...> writes:
Yep. If you just want messaging then the options I mentioned will work
if you need to use Winlink Express features then go with Windows.
You could use
|
By
Basil Gunn
·
#1933
·
|
|
Re: Linux RMS - headed for digital dustbin?
plinBPQ is not a platform you can run WE on. It can serve as a CMS gateway, or even a connection to a TNC/soundcard for WE to use, but you would still need to install WE "elsewhere". Getting WE to
plinBPQ is not a platform you can run WE on. It can serve as a CMS gateway, or even a connection to a TNC/soundcard for WE to use, but you would still need to install WE "elsewhere". Getting WE to
|
By
Scott Currie
·
#1932
·
|
|
Re: [udrc] [nw-digital-radio] Linux RMS - headed for digital dustbin?
None of these options support the forms function of Winlink Express. I realize there are other ways to achieve this, but that train has left. The vast majority of Winlink users are using WE and its
None of these options support the forms function of Winlink Express. I realize there are other ways to achieve this, but that train has left. The vast majority of Winlink users are using WE and its
|
By
Scott Currie
·
#1931
·
|
|
Re: [udrc] [nw-digital-radio] Linux RMS - headed for digital dustbin?
For most linux platforms:
paclink-unix
https://github.com/nwdigitalradio/paclink-unix
pat
http://getpat.io/
pigate
http://www.pigate.net/
linbpq
You have choices.
Full disclosure, I'm one of the
For most linux platforms:
paclink-unix
https://github.com/nwdigitalradio/paclink-unix
pat
http://getpat.io/
pigate
http://www.pigate.net/
linbpq
You have choices.
Full disclosure, I'm one of the
|
By
Basil Gunn
·
#1930
·
|
|
Re: [udrc] Linux RMS - headed for digital dustbin?
Linux RMS Gateway will be supported and will continue to work.
/Basil n7nix
Linux RMS Gateway will be supported and will continue to work.
/Basil n7nix
|
By
Basil Gunn
·
#1929
·
|
|
Re: Linux RMS - headed for digital dustbin?
[Moderator - this should be in the UDRC subgroup.]
John
I've been looking for an alternative platform to run Winlink Express as a client on. I've had problems running the winlink program on the
[Moderator - this should be in the UDRC subgroup.]
John
I've been looking for an alternative platform to run Winlink Express as a client on. I've had problems running the winlink program on the
|
By
sancudo
·
#1928
·
|
|
Re: Linux RMS - headed for digital dustbin?
Randy,
Yes, you can run LinBPQ as a Winlink Gateway on a RPi with Direwolf.
There are instructions for setting up an RMS Gateway on a Pi here:
Randy,
Yes, you can run LinBPQ as a Winlink Gateway on a RPi with Direwolf.
There are instructions for setting up an RMS Gateway on a Pi here:
|
By
John G8BPQ
·
#1927
·
|
|
Re: Linux RMS - headed for digital dustbin?
So, theoretically yes. I don't currently have a UDRC available, but I have run my plinBPQ node and pointed it to a Direwolf instance running on a different Linux machine on the local LAN. Running on
So, theoretically yes. I don't currently have a UDRC available, but I have run my plinBPQ node and pointed it to a Direwolf instance running on a different Linux machine on the local LAN. Running on
|
By
Scott Currie
·
#1926
·
|
|
Linux RMS - headed for digital dustbin?
It appears that LinuxRMS may stop working in the near future when Winlink CMS stops supporting legacy mode.
Has anyone made LinBPQ work with Direwolf?
I’d like to do that on. RPi w/UDRC.
(For
It appears that LinuxRMS may stop working in the near future when Winlink CMS stops supporting legacy mode.
Has anyone made LinBPQ work with Direwolf?
I’d like to do that on. RPi w/UDRC.
(For
|
By
Randy Neals
·
#1925
·
|
|
Re: DRAWS
This block Diagram might help. DRAWS is based on the UDRC-II which has been shipping for 2 years.
This block Diagram might help. DRAWS is based on the UDRC-II which has been shipping for 2 years.
|
By
Bryan Hoyer
·
#1924
·
|
|
Re: DRAWS
Nothing is being 'hidden', this is a new product. What exists is available.
Nothing is being 'hidden', this is a new product. What exists is available.
|
By
John D Hays - K7VE
·
#1923
·
|