Re: UDR56K-4 current draw / fuse
Dean Gibson AE7Q <yahoo@...>
Thank you; that's very helpful. I've reformatted your answers for
ease of reading, and for possible inclusion in an FAQ.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On 2013-04-12 09:35, Dean Gibson AE7Q
wrote:
I'm doing station power planning (West Mountain RigRunner 4012), and I note that the first set of specs said 12vDC @ 5A, but the more recent one says 6A. Questions:
|
|
Re: UDR56K-4 current draw / fuse
"k7udr" <bhhoyer@...>
Answers
1. Does that change w/ the AMBE board?not significantly 2. Does that include the possible max draw from the USB ports?no 3. What fuse capacity do you recommend (5A, 7.5A, or 10A)?10A 4. Is the UDR internally fused?no, but the USB power has a 2A polysilicon resettable fuse 5. Someone previously asked about the power connector. I got theIt is a standard Molex RAST-5 connector (2 pcb mount RA fast-on lugs on 5mm centers in a Polarized latching shell) We provide a 2m 14awg unfused cable with mating connector 6. Dimensions (including footprint)?L x W x H: 180 x 120 x 80 mm 7. On how many sides are connectors (this also affects locationFront: Ethernet w link/activity LED and USB Red-Green Led for CPU Red-Green LED for Radio Rear: RF and Power
|
|
UDR56K-4 current draw / fuse
Dean Gibson AE7Q <yahoo@...>
I'm doing station power planning (West Mountain RigRunner 4012), and
I note that the first set of specs said 12vDC @ 5A, but the more
recent one says 6A. Questions:
-- Dean
|
|
Re: programming APIs
"John D. Hays" <john@...>
Kristoff, Basic programming is simply building on ARM Debian (soft float Wheezy, ala Raspberry Pi is a good starting point.). Our approach to modems is to develop a socket interface for each, with higher level protocols on top of sockets.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Kristoff Bonne <kristoff@...> wrote:
|
|
programming APIs
Kristoff Bonne <kristoff@...>
Hi,
Is there already information available how to write applications for the UDR? As the c2gmsk modem (codec2 gmsk modem) has now been converted into an API, I would be interested to know if it is possible to get it into the UDR. Are there any APIs in the radio, e.g. to do GMSK modulation/demodulation? 73 kristoff - ON1ARF
|
|
Re: Winlink vs. D-STAR
"John D. Hays" <john@...>
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:53 PM, PE1RDW <pe1rdw@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Winlink vs. D-STAR
"John D. Hays" <john@...>
I'd like to generalize this question and answer. On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:00 PM, PE1RDWÂ <pe1rdw@...> wrote: Will LinBPQ be suported as wel? or is winlink run trough BPQ? Will "My Favorite Application" (MFA) be supported?
This is a more nuanced question than it appears. The UDR56K-4 is an open platform, which means there will be applications and accessories that may come from NW Digital Radio (the manufacturer) or from 3rd parties (individuals, projects, and companies).
When asked if something is 'supported' there are different answers depending on the way it is implemented and delivered:
If one has a program to port before their radio is delivered, generally a Sheeva Plug or Raspberry Pi (with soft floating point Debian) is a good test platform. If you can compile and run the code on these devices they will likely be a simple port to the UDR56K-4.
If you are writing for the UDR56K-4 remember it does not have a display, so your programs are better served if they are command line / daemon programs. If you need a display and are writing from scratch, we encourage the use of Web based interfaces. If you want maximum interactivity and low overhead using the web look at node.js and socket.io for delivering your UI. Since this is a Debian system it is possible to use xrdp, vnc, or the X-Window system to remote GUI programs, but running GUI, even over the wire, adds overhead.
We look to have many programs ported and supported on the UDR56K-4 and this forum is a great place to share ideas, collaborate, announce, and support those applications. On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:00 PM, PE1RDW <pe1rdw@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Winlink vs. D-STAR
PE1RDW <pe1rdw@...>
On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 21:27:20 +0200, k7udr <bhhoyer@...> wrote:
ok, thanks, can we compile our own software?Will LinBPQ be suported as wel? or is winlink run trough BPQ?Neither, we use the linux AX.25 stack and add because if that is the case we can put LinBPQ on it ourselfs -- 73 Andre PE1RDW
|
|
Re: Winlink vs. D-STAR
"k7udr" <bhhoyer@...>
Will LinBPQ be suported as wel? or is winlink run trough BPQ?Neither, we use the linux AX.25 stack and add RMS GW: for the gateway Paclink UNIX: for the client Bryan K7UDR
|
|
Re: Winlink vs. D-STAR
PE1RDW <pe1rdw@...>
On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 19:08:45 +0200, k7udr <bhhoyer@...> wrote:
Hi Jim,Will LinBPQ be suported as wel? or is winlink run trough BPQ? -- 73 Andre PE1RDW
|
|
Re: Winlink vs. D-STAR
"k7udr" <bhhoyer@...>
Hi Jim,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
There's a lot of overlap in those numbers as very few orders indicated D-STAR only. APRS and Winlink are well represented. 60% of orders classified themselves as Experimenters, meaning they're going to buy it then figure out what they want to do with it. 5% of orders clicked EVERY application. For the server applications; RMS, IGate and ircDDB the UDR will be single purpose if it's up 24/7. In your shack or vehicle you might choose to run UDR Tracker then switch to winlink to check your mail and later use the DV board for voice. Bryan - K7UDR
--- In UniversalDigitalRadio@yahoogroups.com, "jim.santee" <jsantee@...> wrote:
|
|
Winlink vs. D-STAR
"jim.santee" <jsantee@...>
I have noticed on the order map that a vast majority of the orders are for D-STAR. What few users we have in our area (Astoria, Oregon) are mainly Winlink. Are those who are ordering D-STAR have a user base or they are being ordered with the idea of developing a user base? This is a "what came first, the chicken or the egg?" I am very interested in D-STAR but I can't outrun my user base. Comments?
Jim KF7NE
|
|
Re: DV3000 Add-on card?
"John D. Hays" <john@...>
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Douglas <dperv27@...> wrote:
|
|
DV3000 Add-on card?
"Douglas" <dperv27@...>
Can the DV3000 Add-on card be installed by the end-user if purchased separately?
--73 de N1OBU (FN41AM)
|
|
Re: Multiple Applications / Modes simultaneously running on the UDR56K-4
Bill Vodall <wa7nwp@...>
There are other things one could do, but there are issues with the reality of the world we play in.Reality for some is wilder then some fiction... For example, in 9k6 packet mode one could simultaneously run RMS Gateway and APRS IGate in software. The problem is they are on 2 different channels, each of which is a dedicated resource (please don't suggest scanning as a solution).Why wouldn't scanning be a solution? Timing issues yes but seems it shouldn't just be written off. Anyway the RMS Gateway and APRS IGate functionality are not really interoperative... A LAN channel would do well to use APRS (ala an Igate or two) to announce resources such as RMS or other gateways... There's plenty of bandwidth for multiple resources to share. 73 Bill, WA7NWP
|
|
Re: Multiple Applications / Modes simultaneously running on the UDR56K-4
Mark L Friedlander <marklfriedlander@...>
I knew the UDR56K-4 could do DSTAR data in DV mode but wasn't aware until John posted that the UDR56K also had DSTAR DD capability. Aside from the frequency, power and speed, does the UDR56K-4 DD mode function in the same manner as the Icom ID-1? Can one use two UDR56K-4 as a radio Ethernet bridge to interface two computers over the air? 73 Mark KV4I
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 10:49 AM, k7udr <bhhoyer@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Multiple Applications / Modes simultaneously running on the UDR56K-4
"k7udr" <bhhoyer@...>
Thanks John for getting this thread going.
As John pointed out the radio is in one mode at a time, so running D-STAR and packet apps simultaneously is out for now. There are other things one could do, but there are issues with the reality of the world we play in. For example, in 9k6 packet mode one could simultaneously run RMS Gateway and APRS IGate in software. The problem is they are on 2 different channels, each of which is a dedicated resource (please don't suggest scanning as a solution). This is why I proposed the hailing channel for packet radio at DCC last September (I'll be giving the presentation again at Comms Academy in Seattle). The UDR is the first radio capable of implementing such a concept. I'm sure all of you have your own ideas what we might do with it. The successful ideas will be those that local groups implement, then publish their results for others to use. Let the experiments begin!
|
|
Re: Multiple Applications / Modes simultaneously running on the UDR56K-4
Mark L Friedlander <marklfriedlander@...>
Thanks for addressing my question. I see now that available RAM might be an obstacle to running both WL2K and a Ratflector at the same time. I'm presently running a Ratflector (as well as xtightvnc, a web server and ftp server) on my 512 MB Raspberry Pi with only 162 MB free so setting up a Ratflector on the 256 MB UDR56K might be the only app I can run but it looks like a fun opportunity to experiment.
Thanks, 73 Mark KV4I
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 5:49 AM, John <john@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Multiple Applications / Modes simultaneously running on the UDR56K-4
"John" <john@...>
Mark (KV4I) asks:
NW DIgital Radio will have a pre-packaged RMS Gateway for the UDR56K-4 We have not profiled running D-RATS Ratflector on the UDR56K-4. It does require a fair amount of memory, so observation of it running in parallel with other applications is prudent. Installing D-RATS on the UDR56K-4 (as root or using sudo) Hopefully this information will be helpful in your planning. The D-RATS package can run the Internet server on the UDR56K-4 processor (untested but have successfully installed and executed it) = I have not tested it with an external radio (USB to D-STAR radio) yet. We have not setup the UDR56K-4 radio for direct connection to D-RATS at this point.
|
|
Multiple Applications / Modes simultaneously running on the UDR56K-4
"John D. Hays" <john@...>
General guidelines:
We need to walk a bit before we run :) We hope that users will "run with their ideas" and share what they learn on this forum -- as soon as we can get radios built and shipped! If we see a challenge to what someone is proposing, we'll try to explain alternatives :) [Links to specific examples of add-on devices is for reference only. NW Digital Radio is not affiliated with these companies or products and cannot represent nor endorse their specific capabilities or offerings. The reader is responsible for their own due diligence when searching for suitable enhancement products to use with their UDR56K-4.] John D. Hays K7VE
|
|