Date   

Re: 44 addresses / JNOS 56K / Gateway Security ?

basil@...
 

> I live in the San Juan Islands on Lopez Is. 
> Do you have a gateway or are you playing standalone?

Standalone until I get my fiber connection within a couple of months.

> Any coverage to the South?

It's marginal and likely dependent on tropospheric ducting.
I think there is a lot of interference coming from Whidby Is. challenging any possibilities.
 
/Basil


Re: 44 addresses / JNOS 56K / Gateway Security ?

Bill Vodall <wa7nwp@...>
 

dropped my membership in the 44.net mailing list. Not that it had much effect; nothing's going on there.

So where is it going on and being done better?


Bill, WA7NWP


Re: 44 addresses / JNOS 56K / Gateway Security ?

Dean Gibson AE7Q <yahu.stuff@...>
 

On 2015-02-25 14:25, Tom Hayward esarfl@... [UniversalDigitalRadio] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Dean Gibson AE7Q yahu.stuff@...
[UniversalDigitalRadio] <UniversalDigitalRadio@...> wrote:
That's an understatement. The whole 44 thing is (functionally) a joke. Promises for minor changes are still not made after a year.

I know this is a hobby, but if you are going to try to interest new amateurs (especially those with a network background), don't ever tell them about the 44.net. I finally dropped my membership in the 44.net mailing list. Not that it had much effect; nothing's going on there.
44net has ... an apparent reluctance to change. ...
If you don't like how something is done, just make your own
arrangements.

Tom KD7LXL
EXACTLY.

-- Dean


Re: 44 addresses / JNOS 56K / Gateway Security ?

Bill Vodall <wa7nwp@...>
 

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Don Poaps va7dgp@...
[UniversalDigitalRadio]
I'm just cooling my jets until there's documention on how to setup with Linbpq
http://www.cantab.net/users/john.wiseman/Documents/IPGateway.html

The big question is still if you want to create a new LAN or join an
existing one.

Bill


Re: 44 addresses / JNOS 56K / Gateway Security ?

Tom Hayward <esarfl@...>
 

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Dean Gibson AE7Q yahu.stuff@...
[UniversalDigitalRadio] <UniversalDigitalRadio@...> wrote:
That's an understatement. The whole 44 thing is (functionally) a joke. Promises for minor changes are still not made after a year.

I know this is a hobby, but if you are going to try to interest new amateurs (especially those with a network background), don't ever tell them about the 44.net. I finally dropped my membership in the 44.net mailing list. Not that it had much effect; nothing's going on there.
44net has a reasonable size user base with low average networking
experience and an apparent reluctance to change. That said, AMPR has
allowed users of the 44net IP space to do their own thing as long as
they also support the entrenched RIP and IPIP tunnel scheme. For
example, HamWAN is announcing their address space via BGP, just like
the rest of the Internet. We made arrangement with some other BGP
users to prefer the BGP routes over the IPIP tunnels, so at least our
little piece of 44net has link-state-aware routing and multi-homing.
If you don't like how something is done, just make your own
arrangements.

Tom KD7LXL


Re: 44 addresses / JNOS 56K / Gateway Security ?

Don Poaps <va7dgp@...>
 

John

I'm on the mailing list. In the portal it showed as the one for BC as he got the 44net for BCwarn.

I'm just cooling my jets until there's documention on how to setup with Linbpq

Don va7dgp


On Wednesday, February 25, 2015, 'John D. Hays' john@... [UniversalDigitalRadio] <UniversalDigitalRadio@...> wrote:
 

Don and Paul,

The current system for requesting address space is through http://portal.ampr.org 

According to https://portal.ampr.org/networks.php Canada is administered by 


44.135.0.0 / 16 CANADA Luc Pernot [VE3JGL]

As for the use of Net-44, you should join the mailing list at http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net

I am the administrator for Puget Sound on the US side (Western Washington).  There are several networks allocated, the largest being a microwave based system at http://hamwan.org 

There will certainly be UDRx(s) in the address space, including on San Juan and Lopez Islands. You will see from the pre-order map for UDRx that Puget Sound is slated for many units. http://nwdigitalradio.com/udrmap (zoom in).

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Don Poaps va7dgp@... [UniversalDigitalRadio] <UniversalDigitalRadio@...> wrote:
 

Paul


Don't hold your Breathe. Bob Ve7wnk. Don't quite remember his call was my contact. He is administrator on 44 group. He didn't even know he was administer..

I gave up and went to use Linbpq and using their nodes to pass mail and Winlink.

Don 
Va7dgp

 

On Wednesday, February 25, 2015, ve7dhm@... [UniversalDigitalRadio] <UniversalDigitalRadio@...> wrote:
 

Who else, if anyone, plans to use 44 address scheme in the Pacific North West around the Puget Sound?

I have a allocation request in but it seems to take awhile...still waiting.


Has any testing been done using JNOS with the 56K speed configuration option?


Gateway security - is this a concern for discussion.  Assign static IPs to users, DHCP server, map IPs to

MACs considering a TCP/IP environment?


Paul VE7DHM



--
Don Poaps
New Westminster, BC
VA7DGP
 

--


John D. Hays
K7VE

PO Box 1223, Edmonds, WA 98020-1223 
  



--
Don Poaps
New Westminster, BC
VA7DGP
 


Re: 44 addresses / JNOS 56K / Gateway Security ?

Bill Vodall <wa7nwp@...>
 

I live in the San Juan Islands on Lopez Is. & have just started playing with
an IP network with a another HAM on Orcas Island, Peter K2SPR. Peter
recently acquired a subnet.
Do you have a gateway or are you playing standalone? Any coverage to
the South?

Bill


Re: 44 addresses / JNOS 56K / Gateway Security ?

"John D. Hays" <john@...>
 

Don and Paul,

The current system for requesting address space is through http://portal.ampr.org 

According to https://portal.ampr.org/networks.php Canada is administered by 


44.135.0.0 / 16 CANADA Luc Pernot [VE3JGL]

As for the use of Net-44, you should join the mailing list at http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net

I am the administrator for Puget Sound on the US side (Western Washington).  There are several networks allocated, the largest being a microwave based system at http://hamwan.org 

There will certainly be UDRx(s) in the address space, including on San Juan and Lopez Islands. You will see from the pre-order map for UDRx that Puget Sound is slated for many units. http://nwdigitalradio.com/udrmap (zoom in).

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Don Poaps va7dgp@... [UniversalDigitalRadio] <UniversalDigitalRadio@...> wrote:
 

Paul


Don't hold your Breathe. Bob Ve7wnk. Don't quite remember his call was my contact. He is administrator on 44 group. He didn't even know he was administer..

I gave up and went to use Linbpq and using their nodes to pass mail and Winlink.

Don 
Va7dgp

 

On Wednesday, February 25, 2015, ve7dhm@... [UniversalDigitalRadio] <UniversalDigitalRadio@...> wrote:
 

Who else, if anyone, plans to use 44 address scheme in the Pacific North West around the Puget Sound?

I have a allocation request in but it seems to take awhile...still waiting.


Has any testing been done using JNOS with the 56K speed configuration option?


Gateway security - is this a concern for discussion.  Assign static IPs to users, DHCP server, map IPs to

MACs considering a TCP/IP environment?


Paul VE7DHM



--
Don Poaps
New Westminster, BC
VA7DGP
 

--


John D. Hays
K7VE

PO Box 1223, Edmonds, WA 98020-1223 
  


Re: 44 addresses / JNOS 56K / Gateway Security ?

basil@...
 


---In UniversalDigitalRadio@..., <ve7dhm@...> wrote :

> Who else, if anyone, plans to use 44 address scheme in the Pacific North West around the Puget Sound?


I live in the San Juan Islands on Lopez Is. & have just started playing with an IP network with a another HAM on Orcas Island, Peter K2SPR. Peter recently acquired a subnet. Where are you located?


/Basil N7NIX


Re: 44 addresses / JNOS 56K / Gateway Security ?

Dean Gibson AE7Q <yahu.stuff@...>
 


On 2015-02-25 12:48, Don Poaps va7dgp@... [UniversalDigitalRadio] wrote:
Paul

Don't hold your Breathe. ...

I gave up ...

Don Va7dgp

That's an understatement.  The whole 44 thing is (functionally) a joke.  Promises for minor changes are still not made after a year.

I know this is a hobby, but if you are going to try to interest new amateurs (especially those with a network background), don't ever tell them about the 44.net.  I finally dropped my membership in the 44.net mailing list.  Not that it had much effect;  nothing's going on there.

-- Dean


Re: 44 addresses / JNOS 56K / Gateway Security ?

Bill Vodall <wa7nwp@...>
 

Who else, if anyone, plans to use 44 address scheme in the Pacific North
West around the Puget Sound?
http://www.hamwan.org is the only activity (so far) that I know of.
At least South of the 49th.


I have a allocation request in but it seems to take awhile...still waiting.
Do you want to set up a LAN? Or do you want to participate in an existing LAN?

If you want to set up your own - request a subnet allocation of your
own at the ampr org portal.

If you want to participate the an existing LAN - the folks running it
will be the ones to hand out addresses. Or even better - it would be
automatic with DHCP.

Has any testing been done using JNOS with the 56K speed configuration option?
Not for 20 years...

Paul VE7DHM
Bill, WA7NWP


Re: 44 addresses / JNOS 56K / Gateway Security ?

Don Poaps <va7dgp@...>
 

Paul

Don't hold your Breathe. Bob Ve7wnk. Don't quite remember his call was my contact. He is administrator on 44 group. He didn't even know he was administer..

I gave up and went to use Linbpq and using their nodes to pass mail and Winlink.

Don 
Va7dgp

 


On Wednesday, February 25, 2015, ve7dhm@... [UniversalDigitalRadio] <UniversalDigitalRadio@...> wrote:
 

Who else, if anyone, plans to use 44 address scheme in the Pacific North West around the Puget Sound?

I have a allocation request in but it seems to take awhile...still waiting.


Has any testing been done using JNOS with the 56K speed configuration option?


Gateway security - is this a concern for discussion.  Assign static IPs to users, DHCP server, map IPs to

MACs considering a TCP/IP environment?


Paul VE7DHM



--
Don Poaps
New Westminster, BC
VA7DGP
 


44 addresses / JNOS 56K / Gateway Security ?

ve7dhm@...
 

Who else, if anyone, plans to use 44 address scheme in the Pacific North West around the Puget Sound?

I have a allocation request in but it seems to take awhile...still waiting.


Has any testing been done using JNOS with the 56K speed configuration option?


Gateway security - is this a concern for discussion.  Assign static IPs to users, DHCP server, map IPs to

MACs considering a TCP/IP environment?


Paul VE7DHM


AmateurLogic TV: Building a DV3000 Raspberry Pi D-Star Hotspot

Mark Thompson <wb9qzb_groups@...>
 


Re: DV 3000 for P 25

"John D. Hays" <john@...>
 

Then, yes there are people doing this but I don't have a public (or even private) repository to point you to yet.

On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 10:43 AM, n5vgq@... [UniversalDigitalRadio] <UniversalDigitalRadio@...> wrote:
 

Yes John phase 2 is what I was interested in along with my D-Star.  Jim




--


John D. Hays
K7VE

PO Box 1223, Edmonds, WA 98020-1223 
  


ThumbDV™ vs DV3000

"John D. Hays" <john@...>
 

Comparison at

http://nwdigitalradio.com/thumbdv-vs-dv3000

--


John D. Hays
K7VE

PO Box 1223, Edmonds, WA 98020-1223 
  


Re: DV 3000 for P 25

n5vgq@...
 

Yes John phase 2 is what I was interested in along with my D-Star.  Jim


Re: DV 3000 for P 25

"John D. Hays" <john@...>
 

Depends on which P-25.

P-25 Phase 1 uses IMBE, the DV3000 does not have IMBE.
P-25 Phase 2 HR uses AMBE and the DV3000 can be set for it.  A couple of people have modified DSD to use DV3000.  DSD handles the modem/protocol and the DV3000 handles the AMBE decoding.

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:25 PM, n5vgq@... [UniversalDigitalRadio] <UniversalDigitalRadio@...> wrote:
 

Has anyone whiten any software that will allow the DV-3000 to receive P-25 as of yet. Most of the public safety stuff around here has went or is going to it.   I just can't see spending that much money for  a new scanner just to listen every once in a while.  Jim



Posted by: n5vgq@...



--


John D. Hays
K7VE

PO Box 1223, Edmonds, WA 98020-1223 
  


DV 3000 for P 25

n5vgq@...
 

Has anyone whiten any software that will allow the DV-3000 to receive P-25 as of yet. Most of the public safety stuff around here has went or is going to it.   I just can't see spending that much money for  a new scanner just to listen every once in a while.  Jim



This may only last through the weekend.

"John D. Hays" <john@...>
 

http://nwdigitalradio.com/thumbdv-backorder-special

--


John D. Hays
K7VE

PO Box 1223, Edmonds, WA 98020-1223