Updated DV3000 Installation Document
"John D. Hays" <john@...>
|
|
Re: Libraries for DV3000 builds of AMBEtools
Bob Nielsen <n7xy@...>
Thanks, John, With the libs and wiringPi installed, all compiled nicely.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Bob, N7XY
On May 23, 2014, at 11:04 AM, 'John D. Hays' john@... [UniversalDigitalRadio] <UniversalDigitalRadio@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
|
|
Re: Libraries for DV3000 builds of AMBEtools
"John D. Hays" <john@...>
If you need wiringPi -- see: http://wiringpi.com/download-and-install/
|
|
Libraries for DV3000 builds of AMBEtools
"John D. Hays" <john@...>
|
|
Re: Error compiling dv3000d for NWDigital DV3000 AMBE board
Bob Nielsen <n7xy@...>
No. there is no template for configuring but there is a Makefile. K7VE has been helping on the ircDDBGateway list and at his suggestion I copied settings_raspbian_armhf.mk to settings.mk and it for a half-hour or so but then complained about "cannot find -lusb-1.0” during the linking process. John thought I might be missing portaudio19-dev but I do have that installed.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I did a lot of Fortran IV programming some 45 years ago but never learned C++.
On May 22, 2014, at 6:19 PM, jim@... [UniversalDigitalRadio] <UniversalDigitalRadio@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Also, did the instructions mention doing a ./configure prior to make?
|
|
Re: Error compiling dv3000d for NWDigital DV3000 AMBE board
jim@...
Hi Bob,
I see John got you further along in the ircDDBGateway group....to anyone wanting to see John's answer, jump over to that thread.... Jim
|
|
Re: Error compiling dv3000d for NWDigital DV3000 AMBE board
jim@...
Also, did the instructions mention doing a ./configure prior to make?
|
|
Re: Error compiling dv3000d for NWDigital DV3000 AMBE board
jim@...
Haven't received mine yet, so haven't downloaded the code, but on first glance, I'd think the -march setting you'd want is...
-march=armv6
|
|
Error compiling dv3000d for NWDigital DV3000 AMBE board
Bob Nielsen <n7xy@...>
I received my DV3000 yesterday and have installed it in my Raspberry PI running Rasbian (Debian wheezy-based Linux). I installed libwxgtk2.8-dev and portaudio19-dev. Following the instructions in http://nwdigitalradio.com/preparing-the-raspberry-pi-for-dv3000-applications/dv3000d I copied AMBETools-20140519 to my home directory and unzipped it. However, when I try to compile, I get the following error:
n7xy@raspberrypi ~/AMBETools $ make make -C Common make[1]: Entering directory `/home/n7xy/AMBETools/Common' g++ -g -O2 -Wall -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Wno-strict-aliasing -march=x86-64 -DDATA_DIR='"/usr/local/etc"' -DBIN_DIR='"/usr/local/bin"' -I/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-release-2.8 -I/usr/include/wx-2.8 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGE_FILES -D__WXGTK__ -pthread -c AddressTextCtrl.cpp cc1plus: error: bad value (x86-64) for -march switch make[1]: *** [AddressTextCtrl.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/n7xy/AMBETools/Common' make: *** [Common/Common.a] Error 2 Any thoughts? 73, Bob N7XY
|
|
DV3000 AMBE card
Bob Nielsen <n7xy@...>
On May 21, 2014, at 6:47 PM, Yahoo Groups <notify@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
My card arrived today (that was fast, but it helps to be in northwest WA). It’s going to take a bit of reading before I am able to use it but hopefully I’ll have it going in a few days. I wish the GPIO headers on both boards were a bit shorter so it would fit inside my RPi case, but that’s a minor nit, since I will be moving it to the UDRX-440 when that ships. Bob, N7XY
|
|
Re: [pcrepeatercontroller] DV3000 Info
myyahoo@...
In that case, a simple USB<->Serial converter might work?
These are cheap and commonly available for working with microcontrollers (e.g., Arduinos in 'bare' form). - Richard, VE7CVS
|
|
Re: [pcrepeatercontroller] DV3000 Info
"John D. Hays" <john@...>
Hi Adrian, We don't currently have any plans to offer the DV3000 in a USB or other factor. However, as Jonathan points out. The implementation of the dv3000d on the Raspberry Pi (and hopefully the Banana Pi) makes the device available over a network using UDP without some of the issues and headaches of the USB interface.
The GPIO interface is to a simple UART (Gnd, V+, TX, RX, RTS) and if you can match the voltage and baud rate, then interfacing with other processors and adapters is pretty straightforward.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Adrian <vk4tux@...> wrote:
|
|
DV3000 Info
"John D. Hays" <john@...>
|
|
DV3000 & The 20140519 beta release of the AMBE Tools
"John D. Hays" <john@...>
Ordering: http://nwdigitalradio.com/shop Data Sheet: http://nwdigitalradio.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/DV3000DS.pdf Under Raspbian, prepare your board with the following changes (and reboot) Modify /boot/cmdline.txt: dwc_otg.lpm_enable=0 root=/dev/mmcblk0p2 rootfstype=ext4 elevator=deadline rootwait # dwc_otg.lpm_enable=0 console=ttyAMA0,115200 kgdboc=ttyAMA0,115200 console=tty1 root=/dev/mmcblk0p2 rootfstype=ext4 elevator=deadline rootwait Add to /boot/config.txt: # Speed up UART, set 16x max baud rate init_uart_clock=3686400 Comment out in /etc/inittab: #Spawn a getty on Raspberry Pi serial line
# T0:23:respawn:/sbin/getty -L ttyAMA0 115200 vt100 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: naylorjs@... [ircDDBGateway] <ircDDBGateway@...> Date: Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:56 AM Subject: [ircDDBGateway] The 20140519 beta release of the AMBE Tools To: ircDDBGateway@... Hi Folks
|
|
New Product from NW Digital Radio
"John D. Hays" <john@...>
Dayton Hamvention NW Digital Radio announced, today, immediate availability of the DV3000 AMBE card. There is a Hamvention special for $89.00, which will be honored for 1 month or until current inventory is exhausted (about 100, er make that 90 units). You may purchase at http://nwdigitalradio.com/shop This is the same card that will be used in the UDRX-440 but may be used with the Raspberry Pi. Jonathan Naylor has adapted DummyRepeater and several wav / AMBE conversion utilities, which will be in his next beta release (Monday or Tuesday). SVN users can get the code now, but there is a minor change that will be necessary.
|
|
Re: Testing Resources
Mike Heitmann <n0so@...>
Hopefully someone will post the news here for those of us unfortunate enough to not make it to Dayton this year ( Granddaughters First birthday party for this OM ). Mike, N0SO
|
|
Re: Testing Resources
"John D. Hays" <john@...>
Hi Paul, Some very thought provoking ideas. These are good tools for the community to start thinking about. To that end, it is our plan for the API to include socket access to the modem, as well as many of the system metrics that would aid such tools. As a small company, we will not be able to develop every tool that the community will want or need, but will support developers who wish to undertake their creation -- part of our commitment to an open architecture.
The processor is capable of running Python, C, JavaScript/NodeJS, etc. using standard Debian Linux interfaces and tools. As we prepare for Dayton, our schedules will be pretty busy through the rest of the week.
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Paul Johnson ve7dhm@... [UniversalDigitalRadio] <UniversalDigitalRadio@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Testing Resources
Paul Johnson <ve7dhm@...>
Brian,
The remote location may or may not have internet access. The general concern for me is how do I prove that the initial installation is good - the grounding, cabling, connections etc - then add the RF emitter, and then the RF path - so that when I walk away from a remote site installation I only have to be concerned about the RF path. I would like to see some general usage installation tools which would provide a "good to go" check list. This means being able to locally loop back a few megabits of data with no errors and then do the same end to end over the RF path. Not all installations will be created equally and it would be nice to be able to identify where data link errors are injected into the UDR-X network...is it the installation or the RF path? I have used a Firebird and Fluke network equipment to do end to end testing and I thought there must be software applications that can also do some of the testing done with such equipment checking "keyboard to antenna". It is my understanding that the UDR-X is not full duplex so looping back from RF output to RX input, using a RF signal sampler - Microlab / FXR type - is not possible. So, the alternative is to use two UDR-X units which adds additional complexity to the testing procedure but is better than nothing. The ability of the modem and emitter to operate full duplex certainly is the ideal local test procedure without having to "go on the air". Using two UDR-Xs would accomplish the same goal. For end to end testing over the RF path here again full duplex would be ideal. However, something similar could be accomplished by a store and forward application running at the remote end. The local end would TX a data stream of N bits and the remote end store and then TX back the bit stream to the local end. A checksum, SNR, BER, and constellation display application would give RF path quality. There seems to be quite a bit of info on the internet regarding python, ipython, matlablib, SNR, BER and linux. So, if the UDR-X computer is up to the task then the possibility of general usage installation apps running on it to test an installation looks promising....or maybe adding a Raspberry Pi might also work. Lots of things to think, do and have fun with (; Looking for ideas.... Paul VE7DHM Hi Paul, only RFWhen you say remote location, I assume you have no network access, modemLooping 25W back into our receiver would be a bad idea. :) Looping the would just tell you the processor is running. stored thenDo you mean more of a digipeater mode where received packets are analysisre-transmitted? We could disable checksum to guarantee a response for locally. testingAs part of the Hi-Speed effort, we are building a channel sounder for purposes. This is a PN generator designed for analysis. and useThe easiest thing to do would be to put the remote UDR in sounder mode BER.your local UDR to analyze the received data which includes RSSI and provide theConstellation is an internal design tool at this time, but we will hooks to some enterprising WebGL folks for display. chron jobThe results could be logged locally. We could also run sounder as a successfully(telemetry or beacon) then you'd get results even if you couldn't interesting.talk to the remote unit. A few second burst hourly would be resultsGreat topic. What if you had several internet connected UDRs receiving for comparison? Bryan - K7UDRI'd like more input, I think this topic has a lot of merit.
|
|
Re: UniversalDigitalRadio
myyahoo@...
Yes, it's the RTL stick that I was thinking about (I have a few of these already). I'm interested in the high speed modes that are now being developed, rather than the existing 1.2 and 9.6 kbps low speed data modes.
Watching and (eagerly and maybe a little less than patiently?) awaiting release and delivery. :-) - Richard, VE7CVS
|
|
Re: AW: UniversalDigitalRadio
"siegfried jackstien" <siegfried.jackstien@...>
Use an rtl stick (dvbt usb stick)
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Then your favourite sr software (be it hdsdr, sdrharp or whatever) Route the audio to "soundmodem" and you can receive 1k2 or 9k6 packet Dg9bfc Sigi
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
|
|