Sourceforge project UIChat v 1.07 is a Linux (RPi) based AX.25 Bash command line utility to send UI messages between stations with optional digipeaters. Version 2.0 is now defunct, because the source

You can read that in the specs. A bit much to explain on an email list. If you don't know what they are, it's probably not a solution for you.

UI Frames are ideal for such a thing, but they carry no ARQ so no guaranteed delivery. No connection at all, just a frame between two call signs with data (up to 255 bytes) in it. If you have to have

Basil, Understood. I may give it a go to see if the card "lights up" after installing the usual audio suspects. My uses are VERY specific to one application of my own creation (hence the need for rece

Oh I have done that. Which is why I never want to do it again :) A repo source is much more reliable long-term. Alternately, I could install QtCreator I guess. That's a hammer, but may work and requir

Qt version not kernel version

I make extensive use of Qt for things such as MQTT and others. The version on buster is 5.11.2 which is ancient. Ubuntu and Manjaro seem to have newer versions. Has anyone had success using the DRAWS

LOL, ok. It'll hit bottom eventually.

Not that kind of scope :) --Same stuff used on scope mounts.

Use the Blue version if you want to get it open again. :) Same stuff used on scope mounts.

It'd be interesting to try this in Win10's Linux bash shell, using Windows Sub-system for Linux. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/wsl/install-win10 open a std cmd.exe box, and type "bash" <Ent

#image

And you could always mute the discussion for yourself as well. RPi ham radio. There it's on topic also.

Sorry to bother you then. Perhaps if you did not reply you would not be bothered. :)

I do it 7 days a week on any number of systems. The notion is the same. RPi's are hardly under-powered these days. I have Win10 boxes that are slower than my 1st gen RPi4. I wasn't focused on RPi with

One must weigh "weight" vs increase in efficiency. I do this 7 days a week for a living, and a plain text editor just doesn't cut it. I'ts the complexity to value ratio. Definitely subjective.

It's funny how perceptions differ. I feel Code is very light vs. being heavy, but then my day job is using QtCreator, which definitely IS heavy (and indredibly good). Any really useful IDE is going to

Microsoft "code" is a good and very efficient editor for a source code IDE. Anyone who does any of the "scripting" type languages, like go, node, python, javascript, css, html, etc. would benefit from

wow, that explains a LOT

#draws

Just last week, I took an RPi4 with the tiny fan in the lid of the plastic case (from CanaKit) out into the wilds of a military installation in the heat and humidity (and it rained almost the whole ti

Wouldn't that be a question for the Pat developers?